recombinant murine cxcl12 (PeproTech)
Structured Review

Recombinant Murine Cxcl12, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant murine cxcl12/product/PeproTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Smooth muscle cell-derived Cxcl12 directs macrophage accrual and sympathetic innervation to control thermogenic adipose tissue"
Article Title: Smooth muscle cell-derived Cxcl12 directs macrophage accrual and sympathetic innervation to control thermogenic adipose tissue
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114169
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Relative mRNA levels of denoted chemokine signaling pathways in BAT from control and DTA Sma mice ( n = 3 mice/group). (B) Cxcl12-DsRed mouse model. (C) Representative image of whole-mount DsRed immunofluorescent imaging of BAT from Cxcl12-DsRed mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Representative image of in vitro brown adipogenesis from Cxcl12-DsRed mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Representative images of Sma and DsRed immunostaining of BAT sections Cxcl12 DsRed mice. Scale bars, 100 μm. (F) Representative images of in vitro brown adipogenesis treated with vehicle or recombinant murine Cxcl12 (rmCxcl12). Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Relative mRNA levels of denoted pan-adipocyte (left) and thermogenic (right) markers from cultures described in (F) ( n = 3 mice/group). (H) Experimental design for isolating and evaluating Cxcl12 DsRed cells from BAT tissues. For cell culture studies, BAT SVF cells were cultured for 24 h prior to immunostaining. (I) Representative image of cultures described in (H) immunostained for Sma. Scale bar, 100 μm. (J) Quantification of Sma-Cxcl12 DsRed colocalization compared to total Sma + cells ( n = 3 mice/group). (K) Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plot identifying a Cxcl12 DsRed /Sma + cell population within BAT. (L) FACS analysis of Cxcl12 DsRed /Sma + cell population compared to total DsRed cell number from denoted tissues ( n = 3 mice/group). (M) Cxcl12 DsRed /Sma + cell population frequency from denoted tissues ( n = 3 mice/group). (N) Cxcl12 DsRed /Sma + cell population abundance from denoted tissues ( n = 3 mice/group). Data in (A), (G), (J), and (L–N) are represented as the mean ± SEM. Student’s unpaired t test was used to analyze denoted significance (ns, non-significant).
Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions, Control, Imaging, In Vitro, Immunostaining, Recombinant, Cell Culture, Fluorescence, FACS
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative photograph of BAT from control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice 6 weeks post-tamoxifen. (B) BAT weight from mice described in (A) ( n = 10 mice/group). (C) Representative H&E image of BAT sections from mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) Lipid droplet area quantification of images described in (C) ( n = 3 mice/group). (E) Triglyceride levels from BAT depots from mice described in (A) ( n = 6 mice/group). (F) Relative mRNA levels of pan-adipocyte markers from BAT from mice described in (A) ( n = 4 mice/group). (G) Relative mRNA levels of thermogenic genes from BAT from mice described in (A) ( n = 4 mice/group). (H) Representative images of Ucp1 immunostaining of BAT sections from mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: quantification of percentage Ucp1 area in BAT sections from control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice ( n = 3 mice/group). (I) Representative Ucp1 immunoblot from BAT from mice described in (A). Right: quantification of immunoblot ( n = 3 mice/group). (J) Representative images of TH immunostaining in BAT sections from mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (K) Representative TH immunoblot from BAT from mice described in (A). Bottom: quantification of immunoblot ( n = 3 mice/group). Adrenal gland (AG) was used as a positive TH control. (L) Representative images of TH immunostaining in BAT sections from control and DTA Sma male mice 6 weeks post-tamoxifen. Scale bars, 100 μm. (M) Representative TH immunoblot from BAT from mice described in (L). Bottom: quantification of immunoblot ( n = 3 mice/group). AG was used as a positive TH control. Data in (B), (D–I), (K), and (M) are represented as the mean ± SEM. Student’s unpaired t test was used to analyze denoted significance. * p < 0.05; ns, non-significant.
Techniques Used: Control, Immunostaining, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Experimental design: TMX-induced control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice were maintained at room temperature for 6 weeks. Subsequently, mice were cold exposed (6.5°C) for 24 h. (B) Intrarectal temperatures from mice described in (A) ( n = 8 mice/group). (C) Energy expenditure of control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice maintained at room temperature (RT) and subsequently exposed to cold ( n = 8 mice/group). (D) Representative images of H&E staining of BAT sections from mice described in (A) at denoted time points throughout cold exposure. Scale bars, 100 μm. (E) Representative images of TH immunostaining of BAT sections from mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (F) Experimental design: at P60, TMX-induced control and Cxcl12 Sma KO male mice were fed an HFD for 6 weeks and phenotypically evaluated. (G) Body-weight curve from mice described in (F) ( n = 8 mice/group). (H) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test from mice described in (F). Inset: area under the curve calculation ( n = 8 mice/group). (I) BAT weight from mice described in (F) ( n = 8 mice/group). (J) Representative images of H&E staining from BAT sections from mice described in (F). Scale bars, 100 μm. (K) Representative images of Ucp1 immunostaining of BAT sections from mice described in (F). Scale bars, 100 μm. (L) Representative images of TH immunostaining of BAT sections from mice described in (F). Scale bars, 100 μm. Data in (B), (C), and (G–I) are represented as the mean ± SEM. Student’s unpaired t test was used to analyze denoted significance; * p < 0.03; ns, non-significant.
Techniques Used: Control, Staining, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Relative mRNA levels of F4/80 within BAT from control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice 6 weeks post-TMX ( n = 5 mice/group). (B) Flow cytometric analysis of total CD68 cell number from BAT depots from mice described in (A) ( n = 4 mice/group). (C) Relative mRNA levels of denoted pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers from mice described in (A) (n = 3–4 mice/group). (D) Flow cytometric analysis of CD301 abundance from BAT depots from mice described in (A) ( n = 5 mice/group). (E–K) At P60, control and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice were administered TMX and evaluated 0, 1, 3, and 6 week post-TMX induction. BAT weights (E), lipid drop area quantification (F), TH fluorescent area quantification (G), CD301 abundance (H), H&E staining (I), TH immunostaining (J), and CD301 flow cytometric analysis (K) were assessed. Scale bars, 100 μm. Data in (A–H) are represented as the mean ± SEM. Student’s unpaired t test was used to analyze denoted significance; * p < 0.03.
Techniques Used: Control, Staining, Immunostaining
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Experimental design: at P60, Control Sma and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice (left) or Control Sma and DTA Sma mice (right) were administered TMX and maintained at RT for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the mice were administered one dose of rmCxcl12 (100 ng/mouse) for 10 consecutive days. (B) Representative H&E image of BAT sections from Control Sma and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Representative images of Ucp1 immunostaining of BAT sections from Control Sma and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) Representative images of TH immunostaining of BAT sections from Control Sma and Cxcl12 Sma KO mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (E) Representative H&E image of BAT sections from Control Sma and DTA Sma mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (F) Representative images of Ucp1 immunostaining of BAT sections from Control Sma and DTA Sma KO mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Representative images of TH immunostaining of BAT sections from Control Sma and DTA Sma KO mice described in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm. (H) Experimental design: at P60, RT-reared Control Sma male mice were housed at thermoneutrality (30°C) for 3 weeks. Subsequently, the mice were administered one dose of rmCxcl12 (100 ng/mouse) for 10 consecutive days. (I) Representative images of H&E staining of BAT sections from mice described in (I). Scale bars, 100 μm. (J) Representative images of TH immunostaining of BAT sections from mice described in (I). Scale bars, 100 μm.
Techniques Used: Control, Immunostaining, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Techniques Used: Recombinant, Saline, Electron Microscopy, Staining, Reverse Transcription, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, SYBR Green Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, XF Assay, Software

